RE: Deconstruction

Dear Christian,

Some of you may just be realizing that many of us are deconstructing our faith. We noticed that you seem to be confused by this, so I thought I would clarify a couple of points around the usual statements I hear from those in organized religion.

Misconception 1 – Deconstructionists want to sin more.

I understand why you think this way, especially when everything that you disagree with is considered a sin; then, it isn’t hard to classify everyone outside your bubble as sinful or demonic or whatever label you want to attach to them.

In deconstruction circles, I notice that once people are free of the tyranny of organized religion, they tend to live more authentic lives and be better people because their lives are better outside of organized religion than they were within. I know this is hard to understand when all of your leaders are routinely “falling from grace,” but don’t assume that just because someone is different from you, they are more evil or more like your leaders.

Misconception 2 – because you disagree, you are bitter.

Most Christians are not allowed to have very many emotions. You assume that if someone strongly disagrees with your point of view, they are bitter because of what happened inside religion. To begin with, it might be fruitful for you to investigate that; if they are bitter about what you did to them, you should find out more about that, not less.

But generally, we are not bitter. Sometimes, we are angry because of what was done to us, and we are frustrated with organized religions’ refusal to move in positive directions to care for the least of these and care more about individuals than their corporations and organizations. Sometimes, we’re not angry enough because many of us have been abused and neglected, and you gaslighted us and used us as examples when we left.

We feel more emotions now, and we refuse to apologize for them.

Misconception 3 – because you disagree, you are theologically illiterate.

In most cases, the opposite is true. Most of us who are deconstructing are the ones who studied harder and asked more questions. We are not ignoring the Bible; we are refuting it, and through diligent study, we have abandoned some of the simple myths around it, such as that it is inerrant or the only source of truth.

It’s just exhausting to tell Christians that I studied the Bible meticulously for over 25 years. When Christians can’t accept that, they accused me of being from the wrong branch of Christianity and that Satan somehow caused me to stumble.

People in Christianity trust the pastor to disseminate God’s will for them. Most clergy are too busy running the organization, and their theology is mostly defending what they already assume to be true. Those of us who went further and looked deeper into the mysteries of that ancient book and those ancient practices are able to understand what Christianity hasn’t had time to investigate yet because they are running a business.

Misconception 4 – because you disagree, you are controlled by Satan.

Satan, or the devil, is the narrative created by people who needed a scare tactic to keep people in line and sell the doctrine they were promoting. However, a careful look at the evidence and any thoughtful stroll through the literature of the past help us understand that the “adversary” Character most likely evolved from an Egyptian idea and then the many adaptations and changes by authors like Dante along the way.

Groups like the Satanic Temple and the Church of Satan do not believe in an actual being. They are most generally groups that promote political change, especially in religious theocracy (i.e., 10 Commandment statutes). The fear of Hell and the mythos of Satan are not only used by the church to scare people, but they are also part of most people’s trauma when they decide to evolve past Christianity.

Misconception 5 – You are just trying to get attention.

This also couldn’t be further from the truth. Many of the people who left organized religion were wounded in various ways. The last thing we want is attention, especially from organized religious people who have the intent to harm us for challenging their worldview. We do realize that when we speak against a powerful organization like the industrial Christian machine, we will be demonized, attacked, and gaslighted in just about every area of our lives. Abuse survivors are telling the truth 95 percent of the time statistically. Still, instead of listening, the organization of religion will continue to attack anyone who dares to disagree with what they consider the perfect creed.

So, just Like any other abuse survivor, we know we will get attention, but that is not our primary intention. Our primary intention is to stop organizations, clergy, and church members from harming people. In many ways, we are taking some of the brunt of their anger so that systems will be inspired to change and victims will become survivors.

We often lose our livelihood and reputation to speak truth to power. But most of us believe that if there is anything redeemable about Christ, it is that this was his practice—to stand up for the “least of these.”

Summary

I started my deconstruction journey by assuming that God could handle my questions if he were real. So, I started asking questions. When I took a deep dive into things like hell (as eternal conscious torment) and penal substitutionary atonement, it wasn’t long before many other things started to reveal themselves.  I knew I had to avoid the easy pad answers I had been giving for two decades and seek solid answers instead of proof texts.

The pastors and priests you’re currently listening to get paid to keep you from asking too many questions. They have set themselves up as filters for your beliefs, not because they have special information, but because they need you to be under control. It is what keeps the trains running.

Since the advent of the Internet, there are no longer any gatekeepers of information unless we allow them to. We now know, for instance, that many of the ideas of the Christian faith were borrowed from other religions and other parts of culture. We also know that the Christian worldview has evolved based on culture and the need to control.

My theology professor in seminary taught us to investigate the other side. Even though he is partially responsible for my old conservative worldview, he also gave me the tools to investigate for myself and come to my own conclusions. When I finally looked deeply into alternative theories, I discovered not a new orthodoxy but a glorious universe I could explore for the rest of my days.

Be where you are,

Be who you are,

Be at peace!

Karl Forehand

A Prescription for Healing

It’s Going to be Okay

The Jezebel Scapegoat Shuffle

My Top 10 Suggestions for Theologians

Was Jesus well-known in the 1st Century?

Colosseums and Cathedrals


This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image.png

Karl Forehand is a former pastor, podcaster, and award-winning author. His books include Out into the Desert, Leaning Forward, Apparent Faith: What Fatherhood Taught Me About the Father’s Heart, The Tea Shop, and Being: A Journey Toward Presence and Authenticity. He is the creator of The Desert Sanctuary podcast and community. He has been married to his wife Laura for 35 years and has one dog named Winston. His three children are grown and are beginning to multiply! You can read more about the author here.

7 responses to “An Open Letter to Christians”

  1. mermaid55 Avatar
    mermaid55

    Yup I hear this from men all the time— as a radical lesbian feminist, of course this means I hate men. But my attitude is men need to step up, and if they mess with me, I get to fight back. Men rule these horrifying churches and have been at it for centuries. Man hatred is a crime in patriarchy, any woman who dares to call out men HATES them, what a con job. So how do I deal with this? Might as well say, “Well I HATE YOU right this minute you ignorant fool, now go say this to the men who want their freedom, say that all black people hate whites for wanting freedom, translation only men’s freedom counts only men get to attack their enemies. But one woman asks some man to leave her alone, well that means HATRED of men. Why can’t I get to hate male enemies? Everything here is rather unimaginative– the whole sin more, satan got you, and don’t forget the big one, “woman you don’t know your place and must be silent in the church”—wow any man who tried that with me will get WAR from me.

    ALL MEN are the problem worldwide, and they hate the rise of women globally. Yes, they will lose their god like arrogance, and yes, they can’t stand radical feminists because we’ve been onto them for decades and decades and decades. We protested their right wing/left wing creepy selves since well hundreds of years.

    I don’t expect any man to get this, of course not, and whether you are liberal or conservative really matters little to me. When men own up to their patriarchal horror stories and fess up to their wichcrazes in Europe, their excommunication of women who spoke out, their arrogant control of congress, and all social structures, including sexuality, which they believe THEY can own and control women. That is who men are.

    My job is to tell women to REFUSE that male supremacist worldview, and whether it is religion, or psychiatry or the male medical machine or big pharma or male worship of their bombs, nuclear bombs, their marching to war, their flags, the ignorance. It is the Y chromosome perhaps that was the problem.

    My rant for the day. Deal with women’s raging at the MAN-chine!

    Audrey, take no prisoners me

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Karl Forehand Avatar
    Karl Forehand

    Thanks for sharing

    Like

  3. mermaid55 Avatar
    mermaid55

    My job is to monitor men on the right and the left. Since all women have no idea who men really are, we have a right to suspect everything you have to say about religion and politics and economics and medicine and history and every word you say about who you are. I am fond of saying everything men write about religion is a lie including “a” and “the.” So keep the lies coming, and I will warn women that the biggest dangers are so called ex-christian men. Why, because they can’t deal with women who want our freedom or our power. And you can’t take it, social media gives women incredible power.

    I am very strong physically, so I have no problem with defending myself or standing up to men in the real world. But I notice how women are cowed by men in all public spaces, including churches.

    Thank about that.

    Like

  4. mermaid55 Avatar
    mermaid55

    I’m open to deadly serious anti-patriarchal and male supremacist dialogue with women who broke free from those cults. Good job. Read Mary Daly’s books, she was light years ahead of her time, and packs more intellectual power and scholarship into her critique of the global religion known as patriarchy. She pulls together male domination and terrorism in all its forms, from the witch craze in Europe, to female genital mutilation, to psychiatry. Banned from Catholic divinity schools in the US, she headed to Europe as the only woman student at these schools. She has several PhDs, I met her in person, she died sadly in 2010 and was born in 1928. Her “Seven Deadly Sins of the Fathers” and brilliant strategy of “reversing the patriarchal reversals” should be available to all women battling the male lies about women’s profound global movement for freedom. Breaking free, she skewers Gandhi, and the Catholic church. No holds barred, so engage women. I looked at the sites of women recommended here, a little tame for me, but I lucked out and never had a single religious upbringing. So my parents wisely critiqued Christian fundamentalism and warned of its dangers in the 70s. We debated Jerry Falwell, took on those evil right wing male churches, we’ve been at it for a very very long time women. You’ll learn more from the feminists of 1898 than even the ones from today! Go for it women!!! Go go go !!!!!

    Like

  5. Bob Avatar
    Bob

    I think it can best be stated that my deconstruction has primarily come about from what I perceive as the significant variance of faith doctrines from so many prominent ‘stalwarts’ of the faith. That the likes of John Piper and RC Sproul come to diametrically opposed perspectives as to matters of salvation, depravity and sovereignty from the likes of Greg Boyd and Dave Hunt – wherein these ‘giants in the faith’ have studied the languages, culture and history of Christianity seems to indicate, at least to me, that believers essentially decide what they wish to believe – and reject those tenants that they disagree with and predicate a faith on little more than personal opinion.

    Like

    1. Karl Forehand Avatar
      Karl Forehand

      Right. Theology is guesses. When you accept them, you have to defend them and it takes faith because they are not proven. When someone has new guesses they believe in, another branch is created.

      Like

      1. Bob Avatar
        Bob

        Theology = the science of God. I remember being told in a high school youth group that the Bible is to Christians what the periodic table is to chemistry … we can trust what’s in it. Well, apparently I got a little too close to Calvinism aka the Doctrines of Grace, tried to understand them – but couldn’t and eventually my faith exploded and disintegrated into a mist blown about through the air. Perhaps it didn’t help that because of my constant questions as to Calvinism, I must not be one of the elect. It only stood to reason. I was never saved – even though I thought I was for some 40 years. Rather, if anything, I’m reprobate. And, God through his sovereign desire had wanted something different, he would have made me believe. Well, at this point, I simply reject it all.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment